The irony of St Alban
A while back there was a bit of a controversy over the suggestion that St George should be replaced with St Alban, who is seen as more “inclusive”.
There’s an irony at the end of this particular farce, though.
Saint Alban was a pagan soldier in the Roman Army stationed in Britain. His exact background is unknown, but popular tradition declares him a native Briton. Bede says he lived during the religious persecutions of the Emperor Diocletian (c.AD 304), though modern historians have argued for similar circumstances which arose some years earlier, during the reigns of Decius (c.254) or Septimus Severus (c.209).
During these dangerous times, Alban received into his house and sheltered a Christian priest, supposedly named Amphibalus, and was so struck by the devotion to God and blameless life of this man whom he protected, that he placed himself under his instruction and became a Christian. A rumour having reached the governor of Verulamium (now St. Albans), that the priest was hiding in the house of Alban, he sent soldiers to search it. Alban, seeing them arrive, hastily threw the long cloak of the priest over his own head and shoulders and presented himself to the soldiers as the man whom they sought. He was immediately bound and brought before the governor who, at that moment, was standing at one of the civic altars, offering up a sacrifice. When the cloak, which had concealed Alban’s face, was removed, it was immediately revealed that he was not the priest whose arrest the governor had ordered. The latter’s anger flamed hot and he ordered Alban, immediately, to sacrifice to the gods or to suffer death.
St. Alban steadfastly refused to offer to idols. Then the magistrate asked, “Of what family and race are you?”
“How can it concern thee to know of what stock I am?” answered Alban. “If thou desirest to know what is my religion, I will tell thee - I am a Christian and am bound by Christian obligations.”
“I ask thy name, tell it me immediately.”
“I am called Albanus by my parents,” he replied, “and I worship and adore the true and living God who created all things.” Then the governor said,
“If thou wilt enjoy eternal life, delay not to sacrifice to the great gods.” Alban rejoined,
“These sacrifices which are offered to devils are to no avail. Hell is the reward of those who offer them.” The governor ordered St. Alban to be scourged, hoping to shake his constancy by pain. But the martyr bore the stripes patiently and even joyously, for our Lord’s sake.
When the judge saw that he could not prevail, he ordered Alban to be put to death. On his way to execution, on 20th June, the martyr had to cross a river. “There,” says Bede, “he saw a multitude of both sexes, and of every age and rank, assembled to attend the blessed confessor and martyr; and these so crowded the bridge, that he could not pass over that evening. Then St. Alban, urged by an ardent desire to accomplish his martyrdom, drew near to the stream, and the channel was dried up, making a way for him to pass over.”‘
Then the martyr and his escort, followed by an innumerable company of spectators, ascended the hill above Verulamium, now occupied by the abbey church bearing his name. It was then a green hill covered with flowers, sloping gently down into the pleasant plain. However, the executioner refused to perform his office and, throwing down his sword, confessed himself a Christian also. Another man was detailed to deal the blow and both Alban and the executioner, who had refused to strike, were decapitated together.
These sacrifices which are offered to devils are to no avail.
Says it all, really.


I don’t think I’ve ever been so thoroughly damned with faint praise — it it was even praise — in your comment on Jihad Watch.
Now we have established that I go off half-cocked and that my husband is the better writer.
Robert has also specified that my apology, which I worked on carefully, was insufficient to meet the seriousness of my crimes.
Remind me to take you off my list of possible eulogists for my funeral, which will be sooner rather than later if LGF has its way.
A pox on all of you (see, there’s my “passion” you mentioned).
April 24th, 2008 at 10:54 pmI would have called it more praising with faint dammes.
Evidently in my attempt to mediate I stepped over the line. Unlike you I can’t even fall back on the “eye of the beholder” thing, as my comments were not easy to misinterpret. So…
Well, repent at leisure, as they say. He should have accepted your apoogy. I shouldn’t have said the things I said. Perhaps, eventually, you can accept mine.
April 24th, 2008 at 11:17 pm